The shock tower mounting bracket is the suspension part of the vehicle. The center part of the suspension supports the shock absorber, and the left and right sides support the upper arm, which absorbs impact and vibration of the vehicle. Therefore, we would like to develop a shape design method of the product by simulating shape and structure in the development of the shock tower mounting bracket product. Fig. 1(a) shows a simple modeling of the shape of the shock tower mounting bracket to be studied and Fig. 1(a) shows the shock tower mounting bracket which is placed in the position in suspension module.

Fig. 1 
(a) Shock tower mounting bracket and (b) Mounting bracket position in suspension module

The hybrid mold to be developed in this study is a mold that can be applied to two types of vertical / horizontal type with one mold. It is a great feature that vertical and horizontal casting process can be applied simultaneously. The biggest difference between the vertical and horizontal molds is the joining position of the mold sleeves. In this study, it is featured to design the sleeves to be able to inject castings in both directions. That is, a part of the mold is designed to be inserted so that the two types of sleeves can be used in the design and manufacture of the hybrid mold as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2 
Simultaneous use vertical and horizontal type squeeze casting

In order to establish the casting method, a cast flow analysis of the aluminum shock tower mounting bracket through the process simulation was carried out. Through this, the mold was designed by correcting the expected defect occurrence area. Due to the nature of the horizontal / vertical hybrid caliper mold, the position of the injection port is different, so the filling aspect and the swirling part of the melt are different. Therefore, the casting condition according to each process was changed, and the optimum casting condition was established by controlling the process parameter. The parameters for establishing the optimum casting conditions are hydraulic speed, molten metal temperature, mold temperature, cooling rate, and optimum casting conditions were established through computer simulation. This study was carried out to investigate the microstructure of T6 after casting and to develop a product with excellent strength by establishing optimum casting conditions.

Shock tower mounting bracket parts were analyzed by using the MSC Nastran program. Through the investigation of the analysis results, we have searched for the weak area and proposed the durability examination and the reliability assurance method. Fig. 3 shows the material analysis conditions and the model used for the strength analysis. The four holes on the part were fixed and the load was applied to the center of the part. The number of elements was modeled as about 350,000, and the weight of the model was 1.7 kg.

Fig. 3 
Analysis model of mounting bracket

Fig. 4 shows the load direction of the reverse braking (RB) load condition as an example. In the case of RB load condition, it shows the load condition applied to the vehicle when the vehicle is backward and performs the braking operation. The reason why the load is not given only to the distribution load of 1 g of the vehicle is because it gives the design load condition considering the safety factor of the vehicle. The load conditions used in the analysis refer to the design conditions of ETA and LOTUS which are commercial analysis companies.³ As shown in Fig. 4, each load case is given a load in different directions for each load case according to Table 1, and the load is applied to the wheel center and the tire ground plane is fixed.

Fig. 4 
Example of loading in reverse braking (RB) condition

Fig. 5 shows the analysis process of the shock tower mounting bracket through casting analysis. Generally, by computer simulation, we can predict casting conditions for each process by predicting vortex generation and defects generated during charging.

Fig. 5 
Optimization of casting process of module bracket by computer simulation

In this analysis, casting analysis was performed by simple computer simulation using Anycasting program. Through the analysis, the optimum conditions of casting speed and casting pressure were extracted by trial and error method. The optimization method was extracted by trial and error method to minimize bubbles or pores generated during casting. Through this, the optimum casting condition was determined.

Castings made from A356 alloy can be T6 heat treated by composite casting process. After the heat treatment, microstructural changes due to heat treatment were observed. Fig. 6 shows the microstructure before and after T6 heat treatment. It can be confirmed that the crystal grains became finer after the heat treatment.

Fig. 6 
Optical microstructure (a) before and (b) after T6 heat treatment

Fig. 7 shows the results of the dynamic stiffness analysis. When the load is applied to the shock tower, the weak area is the area shown in the Fig. 7. This vulnerability seems to require close attention when designing the die mold.

Fig. 7 
Dynamic stiffness analysis results

After the dynamic stiffness analysis, the design of the weak section was improved and the strength analysis was carried out. The weight of the design improvement model was 1.43 kg. The reaction force according to the load conditions in Table 1 was obtained when the component parts were installed in the vehicle as shown in Fig. 8. Table 2 summarizes the reaction forces extracted according to the load conditions when the vehicle weight is 2,310 kg (Equivalent Weight of Equus, Geenesys, K9). It can be seen that various loads are applied in the X, Y and Z directions.

Fig. 8 
Reaction force extraction

Fig. 9 shows the strength analysis results. As shown in the results of the strength analysis, when the load is applied under 6 different loading conditions, the maximum stress value is below the tensile strength and the design model is confirmed to be safe.

Fig. 9 
Strength analysis results in various loading conditions